IPR's Annual Report: Problems By the NumbersThe IPR's annual report for 2004 was released on June 21. It contains disturbinginformation about police behavior and the ineffectiveness of the IPR system, including:
--Percentage of complaints about "repeat offender" officers
--Most Excessive Force complaints racked up by one
--Sustained findings of officers Driving Under the
--Mediations held on cases with Disparate Treatment
--Cases dismissed by IPR and Internal Affairs: 397
--Ratio of people who are satisfied with the IPR process
--Number of "Special reports" the IPR created released
The complete Copwatch analysis is posted on line at
<http://www.portlandcopwatch.org/iprannual04.html>. WEB SPECIAL: Bonus statistics
--Number of training recommendations made to the Police Bureau
--Number of allegations IPR categorized as "False/Trivial.":
173
--The number of appeals to the CRC in 2004: 9
--Percentage of cases handled as "Administrative Referral" or Service complaints,
--Percentage of cases investigated in 10 week goal: 21% --Citizen survey comments included "the police should not be reviewing their own complaints"; nothing happened to the officers in question; and the system was "futile" and "a waste of time"
--Number of cases in which officers revealed apparently
--Length of 2004 report: 128 pages --Recommendations: The IPR highlights a number of policies which need review, regarding the tow policy, off-duty use of vehicles, and ways the Bureau should look at use of force cases (pp. 40-41 and 80).
--Inclusion of more information: The IPR includes a finding changed by the Citizen
Review
Committee (CRC) regarding the use of a Taser; a similar finding was inaccurately
reported last year
(p. 36).
|
Back to IPR
article
People's
Police Report
#36 Table of Contents
People's Police
Report
Index Page
Return to
Copwatch
home page