|
Site NavigationHomeAbout us People's Police Report Shootings & deaths Cool links Other Information Contact info Donate
|
Portland Police Kill Man in Crisis
Robert Delgado Shot in Lents Park
David Dahlen: Violation of Moving Vehicle Policy? Dahlen, 24, was driving a stolen car and police boxed him in (apparently not thoroughly). PCW is not condoning the actions of Dahlen, who was identified days after the confrontation, but questions Officer Pierce's decision to fire at the car he was in as he drove away. Three subsections of the Directive on Use of Force caution against shooting at moving vehicles. They warn this should only be done if there's an "immediate risk of death or serious physical injury to the member or others," note that after incapacitating the driver, "the unguided vehicle may remain a threat to anyone in its path" and tell officers to consider the "unique challenges of target and backstop." Pierce was no longer threatened when the vehicle left, and it's unclear how much traffic was in the vicinity. Since there were gas pumps all around (with warnings not to ignite sparks nearby), she may have violated all three provisions. In 2015, another officer fired his weapon in a gas station (PPR #65) but no wrongdoing was found by the PPB or the consultants at OIR Group (PPR #74). The Portland Police Association (PPA) weighed in on this shooting on their Facebook page on December 25. PPA President Hunzeker wrote that while the PPB "served our city and protected our communities" a "violent criminal" used a car to ram into an officer and she "had to" use deadly force to protect herself and the community as the suspect fled. Although he lives in Washington State, Hunzeker states: "All of us in our city must continue to demand accountability for criminals who terrorize our communities." As with another piece he posted, we wonder if he's referring to the PPB (see "Rapping Back," in this issue). Dahlen was taken into custody on January 2, but managed to escape when a jail custodial staff person left a door open. He was caught a second time on January 8 after police and US Marshals chased him and put spike strips in the path of his car (Oregonlive, January 8). Hayes Settlement: Important Council Discussion, No Punishment for Cop
The media quoted the Hayes family wanting to settle rather than go to trial to avoid being re-
traumatized by Quanice's death (OPB, February 23)--completely understandable. Due to a flaw in
the DOJ Agreement, new information gathered for the civil trial does not prompt a new investigation
as to whether Officer Andrew Hearst (#50996) violated policy when he shot Hayes in the head and
chest. Surprisingly, all the members of Council (except the Mayor) expressed apologies to the Hayes family, usually seen by the City Attorney as admitting liability, but likely not interrupted because the settlement was about to be approved in a 5-0 vote. At the hearing, PCW noted that no African American Portlanders were shot and killed by the PPB between Keaton Otis in 2010 (PPR #51) and Hayes in 2017, though three others were killed in the next two years (Terrell Johnson/PPR #72, Patrick Kimmons/PPR #76 and Andre Gladen/PPR #77).
Bonus Online Fact: The settlement is the second largest for an officer-involved shooting in Portland, behind the $2.3 million paid out to William Monroe who was wounded in 2011 (PPR #60/2013), but more than the suits for the deaths of James Chasse, Jr. in 2006 ($1.6 million, PPR #51/2010) or Aaron Campbell ($1.2 million, PPR #56/2012). For details on the previous top settlements, see portlandcopwatch.org/top25settlements20.html.
|
May, 2021
|
Portland Copwatch Portland Copwatch is a grassroots, volunteer organization promoting police accountability through citizen action.
People's Police Report
#83 Table of Contents
|